March 12, 1999
Dear Reader,
This is the second book in the series explaining something originally called the "Unified Field Theory." This was the name given to a theory that was not in existence, a hypothetical theory which was supposed to be the explanation of how the forces of our universe relate and thus become facets of one unifying principle or force.
In early May of 1965 while in a library at Deols Air Base near Chateauroux, France, I was attempting to discover the nature of electromagnetic radiation when the equivalent of the Unified Field Theory became strikingly evident. The word "field" is inappropriate and a name for the theory has not yet become evident to me. However, the theory given in this series relates the forces and the sciences in a way that is both simple and systematic. It is of a nature which can be comprehended by people who have studied high school physics and algebra, and its rudiments should be taught to children in grade school.
After its discovery, I attempted to interest a few of those who were then considered to be highly educated in physics. This effort proved to be fruitless and I decided that I would wait until physicists discovered it on their own. When Mart Gibson and I met, he became interested in the theory, and its development has become a mutual effort.
The years have passed, and the physicists have remained fixed upon a course that leads away from the truth. About a year ago, we decided that it would be best to make the effort necessary to unveil our "new" theory to those with the educational background to comprehend it and who might still be open to something which may upset much of the scientific community.
Apparently, we are not the first to adopt this theory. An examination of what Einstein was working on at the time he died, led me to believe that he had found the original error in thinking that had made relativity become prominent. And there were others in the distant past who left clues pointing to the existence of such a theory.
Scientists are people and people often react adversely when their belief systems are threatened. So when reading this, please use your own powers of reason as opposed to accepting assertions of the prominent scientists of today.
The Author
Next