Second Amendment Upheld

(Added to this website on 10/16/10.)

Main Menu
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the individual's rights to keep and bear arms, and it states that this right shall not be "infringed." "Keep" means that one's arms cannot be taken away, "bear" means that such arms may be upon one's person or within reach. "Not be infringed" means exactly what it says. The 14th Amendment keeps the states from disarming its citizens. Communist agents in the U.S. have been working feverishly for generations to find a means to take away arms from Americans. An armed populace is much more difficult to control when the communists take over.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in the summer of 2010, reaffirmed that the reach of the Second Amendment extends beyond Washington DC and applies to all 50 states. This ruling was triggered by Otis McDonald in defending his right to have a firearm for home defense - which the government of the city of Chicago would not allow. Subquently, Wisconsin District Attorney Gerald Fox announced that as the result of the Supreme Court ruling, he would no longer prosecute non-violent infractions of his state's gun laws.

"This Supreme Court ruling is binding on all the states and local governments and immediately renders some of Wisconsin's current laws unconstitutional," Fox said. He has decided not to enforce or prosecute infractions of the following state laws.

1.   Section 167.31, prohibiting uncased or loaded firearms in vehicles.
2.   Section 941.23, prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons, including firearms.
3.   Section 941.235, prohibiting the possession of firearms in public buildings.
4.   Section 941.237, prohibiting the possession of firearms in establishments where alcohol may sold or served.
5.   Section 941.24, prohibiting the possession of knives that open with a button, or by gravity, or thrust, or movement.

Fox said that all of these statutes represent "unjustifiable infringement" of the fundamental right of every law-abiding American to arm themselves for self-defense and the defense of their "loved ones, co-workers, homes, and communities."

Fox is a registered Democrat who clearly understands the history and importance of the Second Amendment.

"If you remember our history, it wasn't freedom of the press or freedom of association that won us our independence from Great Britain," Fox said on a radio interview, "It was the individual citizens standing together at Lexington and Concord to protect their stores of ammunition from the British who were there to confiscate it."

"To me, it's no accident that Washington, DC, and Chicago, Illinois, are two of the most dangerous places to live." Fox said, "It's because they don't trust their citizens to protect themselves."

The foregoing was taken from The Gun Owners, a publication of Gun Owners of America.

What Fox said is absolutely true and should be the policy of every district attorney in the U.S. until all of the unconstitutional gun laws have been repealed. All of those laws are contrary to the Constitution of the United States and were put in place by those who were attempting to steal our rights as citizens and to remove the supremacy of our Constitution. In truth, many of those people were (or are) communists and traitors to our nation. Of course, they call themselves by other names.

We need people in places like California and Michigan particularly (currently nests of communists and their useful idiots) that will work to uphold the U.S. Constitution. John D'Agostini, candidate for sheriff in El Dorado County (California), is a good example of the type of people we need in the state of the Golden Grizzly. John believes in a partnership of the people with law enforcement and plans to build community trust so that his deputies can work with the residents and business owners to solve community problems. He plans to "restore customer service and increase respect for civil rights" as well as providing a "politics free" policy for carrying concealed weapons. There are many more patriotic people in California and the nation. They must be voted into office for us to reclaim our liberties.

November 2011 - California - AB 809 signed by Governor Brown

Historically, many millions have been killed by their own governments. The formula is always the same: (1) forced registration of firearms, (2) disarming the citizens, and (3) extermination of dissidents. As examples, in the Soviet Union there were 20 million dissidents killed after their guns were taken away, in Turkey 1.5 million, Germany 13 million, China 20 million, Guatemala 100 thousand, Uganda 300 thousand, and Cambodia 1 million.

The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, superseding all state laws. Its Second Amendment states that we have the right to keep and bear arms, and that this right shall not be "infringed." Because an armed populace is much more difficult to control, Communist agents in the U.S. have been working for several generations to take away our firearms.

In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that the reach of the Second Amendment applies to all 50 states. All laws that infringe upon our right to keep and bear arms are unconstitutional. Yet, "agent" Brown, our governor, recently signed into law AB 809, requiring the registration of all long guns (rifles and shotguns) that are transferred in California. Scheduled to go into effect in 2014, this law means that long guns in one's will, guns one chooses to buy or sell, or guns one chooses to give away for whatever reason, must be registered. Communists are patient. They know that enforcing this law will eventually result in (1) registration of all our guns and (2) criminalization of patriotic Americans. At this point, they will send out teams to take away each person's guns - and kill those who resist.

AB 809 is unconstitutional, as are most of California's anti-firearm laws. It is very difficult to stop the passage of such laws in this state and lawsuits are expensive. Perhaps the best recourse is to pass a federal law which voids any existing measure (city, county, state, or federal), that is unconstitutional - and imposes severe penalties upon those who attempt to pass such measures in the future. We may ask our congressmen to begin drafting such a law, and after the next general election it might actually be passed. Prison sentences or severe fines are a better way to handle the problem than any violent alternative provoked by our enemies, and treason in any form is a criminal act.

Lenin was very wise. Some of his quotes follow.

A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie.

Only an armed people can be the real bulwark of popular liberty.

One of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the arming of the [Communist] workers and the disarming of the bourgeoisie (the middle class).

The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) has been sending out information that is the same that many other organizations have been sending in an attempt to awaken people to the danger we are in. The second paragraph of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states:
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

In Section 2 of Article II of the U.S. Constitution is: [the President] shall have the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur...

If Comrade Obama signs a treaty that is against the Second Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate ratifies such a treaty with a two-thirds vote of those present, we may have a severe problem. The Constitution is mentioned first in Article VI, so it may be that the Supreme Court would find that the Constitution is above the provisions of the treaty. Chief Justice John Marshall (1801 - 1835) gave broad interpretations, and interpreted this clause to mean that the Supreme Court has the power to review the constitutionality of acts of Congress, since, as stated in the clause, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. But the Supreme Court has four members at this time that are essentially Communist agents. One more such agent could turn the vote the other way.

Furthermore, the enemy agents and corrupt politicians in the Senate, in many past instances, have waited to vote upon an issue until only those in favor are present. That is why we have the so-called Federal Reserve now.

The USJF has a solution to the problem. It proposes the creation of an amendment to the Constitution which states: No treaty signed with any foreign entity shall overrule any part of this Constitution, including, but not limited to, the Bill of Rights. We must strive to have such an amendment become a reality.

Main Menu