Contents

Two
SOME of the LOGIC BEHIND NETHER THEORY

  Logic is the art of convincing us of some truth.
La Bryere
 

Note:     "Facts" may be drawn from prior "conclusions".
 

Logic Exercise A

Fact A1:     Electrons are known to have "spin" which is "innate" and always has the same value.

Fact A2:     "Innate" means that the so-called spin is always present when measured and implies that, if it were to slow down or accelerate due to some interfering force, it would simply go back to its original value once this force were removed.

Fact A3:     Only things with their own energy sources can remain spinning or re-establish spin after interference is experienced.

Fact A4:     The only known things in nature to conform to the first three facts are vortices such as tornadoes, waterspouts, whirlpools, etc.   These have their own sources of energy to keep them "spinning."

Conclusion A1:     Electrons are vortices.
 

Logic Exercise B

Fact B1:     Vortices are made of fluids such as gases or liquids.

Fact B2:     Electromagnetic radiation appears to move, sometimes at least, as a wave.

Fact B3:     Waves must have a medium such as a fluid for them to exist.

Fact B4:     Electromagnetic radiation moves through space and other "transparent" mediums.

Conclusion B1:     Space and other "tranparent" mediums are filled with a fluid.
 

Logic Exercise C

Fact C1:     Fundamental subatomic "particles" other than electrons have similar aspects to electrons.

Fact C2:     Things with similar aspects are often members of the same family.

Conclusion C1:     Other fundamental subatomic "particles" are also vortices or groups of vortices.

Conclusion C2:     All subatomic "particles" are actually vortices or groups of vortices made of the fluid which permeates our universe.

Conclusion C3:     Our universe and everything in it, including space itself, is composed of a perfect fluid.
 

Supporting Logic

Fact C3:     If we were to continue accepting a universe of smaller and smaller particles, then we would arrive (1) at a point and at a place where there could be no further subdivision of particles - or (2) at a point where particles become so small as to be nonexistent and the sum of these "nonexistent" particles would be a perfect fluid.   In the first case, we would not be able to explain why these particles interact, just as now physicists cannot explain why our supposed particles interact.   True, physicists make up laws as to why they interact, but a law is a consequence - not a real explanation.   Therefore, the final answers do not lie with particle theory, but with something else - such as fluid theory.
 

Logic Exercise D

Fact D1:     Each vortex has an inward radial vector and a tangential vector which form a resultant vector.

Fact D2:     The inward vector causes fluid flow which begins with almost no magnitude at longer distances from the vortex' center, and culminates with great magnitude of flow near the vortex' center.   Thus, the fluid accelerates as it moves from outward to inward regions.

Fact D3:     Many vortices grouped together would have a combined effect of large fluid acceleration from regions far away from the group center toward the group center itself.

Fact D4:     Gravity appears to be a form of acceleration.

Conclusion D1:     What we call gravity is the acceleration of fluid from space to the center of a celestial body.
 

Logic Exercise E

Fact E1:     Gravity is an inward flow of the fluid that is in the space of our universe.

Fact E1:     Vortices are created by regions of lower pressure at their centers and higher pressure surrounding their centers.

Conclusion E1:     There is a region of lower pressure at the center of every fundamental subatomic "particle", and volumes of fluid under higher pressure thoughout the surrounding space.
 

Logic Exercise F

Fact F1:     Gravity reaches outward to the boundaries of our universe.

Fact F2:     Electromagnetic radiation reaches outward to the boundaries of our universe.

Conclusion F1:     Gravity reaches outward to the boundaries of the fluid that is our universe.

Conclusion F2:     Electromagnetic radiation reaches outward to the boundaries of the fluid that is our universe.
 

Logic Exercise G

Conclusion C2:     All fundamental subatomic "particles" are, in reality, vortices made of the fluid which permeates our universe.

Fact G1:     Vortices are composed of a fluid in motion.

Conclusion D1:     What we call gravity is the acceleration of nether from space to the center of a celestial body.

Fact G2:     Acceleration is a form of movement.

Fact B2:     Electromagnetic radiation appears to move, sometimes at least, as a wave.

Fact G3:     A wave causes movement within its medium.

Conclusion F1:     Gravity reaches outward to the boundaries of the fluid that is our universe.

Conclusion F2:     Electromagnetic radiation reaches outward to the boundaries of the fluid that is our universe.

Conclusion G1:     All of the spatial fluid of our universe is always in motion.

Fact G4:     Motion is a form of energy.

Conclusion G2:     Motion within our spatial fluid is energy.

Conclusion G3:     Our spatial fluid can be considered both primal mass and primal energy.

Conclusion G4:     Energy permeates every part of our universe.
 

Logic Exercise H

Fact H1:     Gravity conforms to the inverse square law.

Conclusion D1:     What we call gravity is the acceleration of nether from space to the center of a celestial body.

Fact H2:     Conclusion D1 does not conform to fact H1 unless our spatial fluid compresses tangentially, extends radially, and accelerates as it approaches a celestial body.

Conclusion H1:     Our spatial fluid compresses tangentially, extends radially, and accelerates as it approaches a celestial body.

Conclusion H2:     Our spatial fluid is expandable and compressible.
 

Logic Exercise I

Fact I1:     A vortex cannot exist unless the medium of which it is composed has inertia.

Conclusion C2:     All subatomic "particles" are vortices made of the fluid which permeates our universe.

Conclusion I1:     Our spatial fluid has inertia.
 

Logic exercise J

Fact J1:     Special relativity as explained by Einstein cannot be correct if our universe has an inertial reference frame.

Fact J2:     To exist, vortices require an inertial reference frame.

Conclusion C2:     All subatomic "particles" are vortices made of the fluid which permeates our universe.

Conclusion J1:     Einstein's theory of relativity is incorrect.
 

Logic Exercise K

Conclusion E1:     There is a region of lower pressure at the center of every fundamental subatomic "particle", and volumes of fluid under higher pressure thoughout the surrounding space.

Fact K1:     The region of lower pressure at the center of each vortex implies that the incoming fluid must have a place to go.

Fact K2:     There is no apparent place for the incoming fluid to go in our three-dimensional universe.

Conclusion K1:     The incoming fluid leaves our universe as we know it.

Conclusion K2:     Each subatomic vortex is a hole into another dimension.
 

Logic Exercise L

Conclusion E1:     There is a region of lower pressure at the center of every fundamental subatomic "particle", and volumes of fluid under higher pressure thoughout the surrounding space.

Fact L1:     Pressure would tend to close a hole at the center of each particle (vorticle).

Fact L2:     The hole remains open.

Conclusion L1:     Something must counter the pressure to keep the hole open.

Conclusion C2:     All subatomic "particles" are actually vortices or groups of vortices made of the fluid which permeates our universe.

Fact L3:     Vortices exert centrifugal force which pushes outward against inward pressure.

Fact L4:     No other force is known at this time which could counter the nether pressure inward.

Conclusion L2:     The centrifugal force of each vortex holds its hole open.
 

Logic Exercise M

Fact M1:     Some vortices or groups of vortices are enduring.

Fact M2:     Some vortices or groups of vortices are temporary.

Fact M3:     For a vortex to be enduring, the pressure surrounding it must be balanced by its centrifugal force.

Fact M4:     Intruding forces exist everywhere which tend to unbalance the forces which keep enduring vortices intact.

Fact M5:     Whenever balanced forces are disturbed and then return to a state of balance, there is a dynamic balancing mechanism involved.

Conclusion M1:     Enduring vortices have a dynamic balancing mechanism.

Conclusion M2:     Temporary vortices do not have a dynamic balancing mechanism.
 

Logic Exercise N

Fact N1:     Dynamic balance for a vortex composed of primal fluid would depend upon fluid pressure difference and centrifugal force.

Fact N2:     An enduring vortex must be a correct size and shape, within certain limits, for the centrifugal force to balance the fluid pressure.

Fact N3:     Assuming that there is no difference between clockwise and counterclockwise vortices, only one size and shape can be used for a vortex to endure alone.

Fact N4:     Assuming that there is a difference between clockwise and counterclockwise vortices, only two sizes and shapes can be used for a vortex to endure alone.

Fact N5:     We know of only two enduring vortices or group of vortices made of primal fluid:   the electron and the proton.

Fact N6:     The nature of electromagnetism provides clues which indicate that the electron is a single vortex as opposed to a group of vortices.

Fact N7:     The proton may be either a single vortex or a group of vortices. There are indications both ways.

Conclusion N1:     The electron is the only stable vortex composed of primal fluid rotating in one particular direction.

Conclusion N2:     Either the proton is a stable vortex composed of primal fluid or it is a composite of several vortices.

Fact N8:     If the proton is composed of smaller vortices, there are more than one type of them.

Conclusion N3:     It is very unlikely that any vortex (quark) which is a constituent of the proton will endure alone.
 

Logic Exercise O

Conclusion C3:     Our universe and everything in it, including space itself, is composed of a perfect fluid.

Conclusion D1:     What we call gravity is the acceleration of fluid from space to the center of a celestial body.

Conclusion H1:     Our spatial fluid compresses tangentially, extends radially, and accelerates as it approaches a celestial body.

Fact O1:     As such a fluid approaches a celestial body (large group of vorticles), it must enter spherical cross-sections surrounding the body which are smaller and smaller in area.

Fact O2:     A spherical cross-section is proportional to the radius of the sphere squared.

Conclusion O1:     The inflowing fluid compresses tangentially in proportion to 1/r² where r is the radius of the spherical cross-section.

Fact O3:     Every theoretical sphere about a celestial body has the same amount of nether passing through it.

Fact H1:     Gravity conforms to the inverse square law.

Fact O4:     At every distance from the center of the celestial body, the acceleration of the fluid must conform to the inverse square law for gravity.

Fact O5:     The only way that the inverse square law can be obtained is for the velocity to be proportional to r^-1/2.

Fact O6:     If the velocity is proportional to r^-1/2, the radial density should proportional to r^1/2.

Fact O7:     The only way that the same amount of fluid can pass through each theoretical sphere is for the radial density to be proportional to r (the square root of r).

Conclusion O2:     The inflowing fluid expands radially in proportion to r^1/2 where r is the radius of the spherical cross-section.

Conclusion O3:     The average density of the inflowing fluid is proportional to 1/r² multiplied by r^1/2 which is r^-3/2.
 

Logic Exercise P

Conclusion C3:     Our universe and everything in it is composed of a perfect fluid.

Conclusion P1:     All matter is made of the perfect fluid.

Conclusion P2:     Any object at an infinite distance from a celestial body will have the same potential energy relative to the body as a quantity of the fluid at the same distance.

Conclusion P3:     Any object falling from an infinite distance from a celestial body will have the same kinetic energy when impacting upon the body as a quantity of the fluid falling from the same distance.

Fact P1:     Kinetic energy, mv_s²/2, is equal to potential energy, mg_aver, where g_ave is average gravity during the fall and v_s is the impact velocity.

Fact P2:     By manipulating the equation mv_s²/2 = mg_aver, we can arrive at v = [2g_aver]^1/2.

Fact P3:     g_ave = Bg_s + (1 - B)g_a   where g_s is the gravity at surface of a celestial body, g_a is the gravity above the surface, and B = 1/[(r_a/r_s) + 1].

Fact P4:     When r_a is equal to infinity, r_a/r_s is so great that +1 is negligible, and
B = 1/(r_a/r_s) = r_s/r_a.

Fact P5:     When r_a is equal to infinity, g_a is zero.   So (1 - B)g_a becomes zero and g_ave = Bg_s.

Fact P6:     From the foregoing, the equation v_s = [2g_aver_a]^1/2 becomes
v_s = [2(Bg_s)r_a]^1/2 = {2[(r_s/r_a)g_sr_a]}^1/2 = (2r_sg_s)^1/2.

Fact P7:     The equation v_s = (2r_sg_s)^1/2 can be generalized for any point above the surface as well, to become
v = (2rg)^1/2.   This can be ascertained by checking the values found by the equation against the values found by the inverse square law for gravity, using a point on the surface of the celestial body as a reference.

Fact P8:     The escape velocity for an object leaving the gravity funnel of the a celestial object must be the same as the impact velocity of the same object were it to fall from an infinite distance away (in the absence of other variables).

Conclusion P4:     The escape velocity at any point upon or above the surface of a celestial object is the same as the instantaneous velocity of the fluid flowing into the celestial object at that same point and can be found by the equation:
  v = (2rg)^1/2.
 

The foregoing can be used as a format for composing your own brief version of nether theory logic as you continue to study it.   Further exercises would become too lengthy for this little book.

 

Science consists of grouping facts
so that general laws or conclusions
may be drawn from them.
Charles Darwin
 

Contents - Next