(Added to this website on 7/4/11.)
Back to Why is Gingrich Being Crucified? The 2012 elections are critical to the survival of the United States as a free nation. In the past, most of those in both of our major political parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, have been more interested in party loyalty than in loyalty to the nation. What we need are the old-time statesmen who had to be dragged to political offices by those who wanted real statesmen to lead us. What we have had recently are mostly candidates who have political ambitions for the purpose of attaining money and power. Career politicians are not what we need.
The GOP must shift to become the Tea Party if we are to survive. Anyone in the Republican Party who is not upholding and defending the Constitution as it is written must be kicked out of the party. Candidates chosen by the GOP leaders cannot necessarily be trusted, and donations to the GOP will be siphoned off to some extent by the GOP middlemen. Since the Republicans have not yet removed the scum in the GOP, voters should save their donations and efforts for candidates of their own choice.
Those of us who provide information to this website don't know everything about any of the candidates for President who are attempting to gain the Republican nomination, and we don't know a lot about many of the major contenders. However, there are tell-tale signs about some that show them as either bad choices or good choices. What follows are what we believe to be true at this time.
Mitt Romney is a slick politician who can be trusted only to do what he must to please enough people to get him elected. He may be the top choice of the Republicans who control the money for the GOP because he is a good GOP member, but in his eyes the Constitution is certainly not the foremost law of the land if it interferes with what Romney wants.
John McCain has endorsed Romney. McCain was chosen by Soros to lose the last presidential election to Obama. McCain has proven to be a wolf is sheep's clothing, who has championed gun control and aided other leftwing legislation in the past under the guise of "working with both sides of the aisle". If McCain endorses Romney, it is just another proof of the leftist side of Romney. If people are stupid enough to be taken in by another, smoother Obama, they deserve what they get.
Sarah Palin is honest and a chosen target for the Democrats because they fear her. She is not ambitious except for the welfare of the nation. Since she does a good job of aiding the cause of those who want us to have constitutional government, perhaps she should be allowed to continue to be the spark that the Constitution-minded folks need. We need her as a force for the good and she can aid the chosen candidate who runs against Obama.
Herman Cain is a very good choice for President in every respect. He is honest and straightforward, intelligent, well-informed, and wants government according to the way the founders of our nation wanted it to be. The smearing that the Democrats have done seems to have finished Cain as a candidate. Too bad people aren't better at judging based upon the issues rather that accepting leftwing smears at election time.
Michele Bachmann has a different style than Cain, but she is equally well qualified to lead the nation and would make a great President.
Rick Perry, like Cain and Bachmann, would be a great choice for President.
The dark horse that is moving into the limelight is Jon Huntsman. We believe he is a wolf in lamb's clothing, the choice of the left to try to bleed off the Republican funding during the primary. If he loses, the real Republicans (or Tea Party candidates) will have spent money and effort to defeat him in the primary - and if he wins, we will have two leftists in November (Obama and Huntsman) from which to choose.
Ron Paul has one thing going for him. He wants to eliminate the Federal Reserve. Frankly, all of the candidates should have enough sense to want to eliminate the Fed. Paul's weakness is his complete lack of comprenhension regarding other nations, our foreign policy, the role of our military, and the need for him to have a reality check. If Paul should be the GOP candidate against Obama, he will easily lose. The military people would find Obama a better choice that Paul as would numerous other voters, including s lot of Republicans. The Democrats would love to have Paul as the candidate against Obama, and those Progressive/Socialist/Communists who are registered as Republicans will be voting for Paul in the primaries. If by some fluke Paul should ever become President, we can kiss our nation goodbye.
Newt Gingrich is probably the best qualified of the Republican candidates. He is smarter than the others which might make him unpopular for the those who are less educated on our political system and the Constitution.
We have other Republican candidates from which to choose that are not mentioned because we
have nothing bad to say about them - nor do we have anything to say that elevates them above
the rest.
Back to Why is Gingrich Being Crucified?