Impeaching Obama

Main Menu



Political correctness is a disease - call it like it is.

"The danger to America is not Barack, but a citizenry capable of entrusting
a man like him with the Presidency.   It will be far easier to limit and undo the
follies of BO than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to
a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.   The problem is
much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what
ails America.   Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast
confederacy of fools that made him their prince.   The Republic can survive
a Barack Obama.   It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools,
such as those who made him their president......."

Apparently translated from an article published by a Czech Republic newspaper, the Prager Zeitung.



The lethal attack that shocked America due to the callous lack of concern by Barack Obama is beginning to awaken more people to the danger posed by a subhuman who was elected by those who may also be subhuman [psychopaths are not really responsible for their inferiority].   Nevertheless, those of us who are not mentally defective should do all we can to remove the mentally defective from positions of power.   What follows should be read by all Americans - but if some will not pay attention, someone must tell them that their days are numbered.   Just as Adolph Hitler did prior to World War II, those who do not serve the dictator's interests any longer will eventually be eliminated, and their children will pay the price of being slaves in a feudal society.

Prelude to the 9/11 Anniversary Terrorist Attack

On 9/11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya, Chris Stevens, the American ambassador, and four other Americans, including two former Navy SEAL operatives working for the CIA, were murdered.   This was not unexpected because Stevens had repeatedly asked for additional security.   Libya was going through a civil war and he and his people were in an area where al Queda was concentrated and had been growing.   The anniversay of the 9/11 attack on the twin towers was approaching and it was felt that an attack was imminent.   The U.S. intelligence community was well aware that al Qaeda was in an "expansion phase" in Libya.   Al Qaeda had training camps in Benghazi, and Anti-Western attacks had been growing since April.   By June Libyan militants were openly discussing the targeting of Stevens.

The consulate could not defend against a "coordinated attack," according to a classified cable reviewed by Fox News.   Summarizing the Aug. 15 emergency meeting, the Aug. 16 cable marked "SECRET" said that the State Department's senior security officer, also known as the Regional Security Officer (RSO), did not believe the consulate could be protected.   "The RSO expressed concerns with the ability to defend the Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound," the cable said.   According to a review of the cable addressed to the Office of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed "on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi ..."

In a cable written days before his death, Stevens warned that a local militia group entrusted to help protect the consulate (the self-styled "February 17 Martyrs Brigade") was threatening to pull out over a political dispute.   U.S. intelligence had "very good information" that the strike was preplanned.   Regardless of the facts, the repeated requests for additional security were denied.

The Attack

The attack began at 9:30 PM local time and lasted in waves until the small hours of the next morning.   Among other things, the terrorists used rocket-propelled grenades and mortars.   At the time, helicopters, fighter jets, and at least one AC-130 were available to help - easily within the seven and one-half hours that the Americans held off their attackers.   Rocket-propelled grenades and mortars were used, with mortar fire doing most of the damage to the area held by the Americans.   The Americans were using lasers to target the enemy mortar positions, assuming that an AC-130 would arrive and use surgical precision to eliminate them.

There was a steady stream of intelligence reporting on the attack, delivered at the FLASH/CRITIC level.   Messages assigned that priority must be delivered to the President within 10 minutes of receipt.   This traffic captured conversations between the Islamist factions responsible for the attack, before and during the assault on our compound.

Leaked E-mails show that President Obama gave the order to stand down during the terrorist attack, meaning that Obama gave the order prevent sending in C-130 gunships and Marines that were ready and waiting to be deployed to Benghazi in response to distress calls from the CIA operatives who were fighting back more than a hundred terrorists.   "... [there was] a group in real-time trying to mobilize marines and AC-130s and the fighter aircraft, and they were told explicitly by the White House stand down and do nothing.   This is not a terrorist action."

The New York Post and sources on the ground in Libya say the Americans pleaded for support during the attack on the Benghazi consulate that led to the deaths of four Americans.   They were allegedly told twice to "stand down."   Worse, there are suggestions that significant military resources were available to counterattack, but requests for help were denied.

Firing Those Who Tried to Help

According to one report, on 27 October Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) currently located in the Middle East.

CSG-3 is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the US Pacific Fleet.   US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore.

The aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) is the strike group’s current flagship, and as of 2012, other units assigned to Carrier Strike Group Three include Carrier Air Wing Nine; the guided-missile cruisers USS Mobile Bay (CG-53) and USS Antietam (CG-54); and the ships of Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer (DDG-108), USS Dewey (DDG-105), USS Kidd (DDG-100), and USS Milius (DDG-69).

US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.

This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama.   And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders:

“The information I heard today was that General [Carter] Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place.   General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down.   His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow.   Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.”

[Since this happened 5 generals/admirals of the U.S. have supported Obama, while 500 have been proud to give their support to Romney - but the anti-American media (which is most of our media) would not allow this to be seen by the voters - or perhaps we have more communists and Muslim terrorists in America that we realized before the election.]

The Cover-Up

Since the news of the attack broke, Obama and his administration misled the American people time and time again.   First they blamed a ridiculous YouTube video, then they blamed the intelligence community and said they didn't know about requests for extra security.

The administration was notified about the dangers.   They knew Al Qaeda was operating in the same city and they knew that Ambassador Stevens and the rest of the diplomatic team feared for their lives, and their security security was inadequate.   And yet no action was taken.

Newt Gingrich appeared on the Fox News' Greta Van Susteren Show and revealed a virtual bombshell - the liberal media may be SITTING ON leaked E-mails that PROVE without a doubt that President Obama gave the order to stand down during the terrorist attack in Benghazi.   That means Obama gave the order to NOT send in C-130 gunships and Marines that were ready and waiting to be rapidly deployed to Benghazi in response to distress calls from the CIA operatives.

"But they were a group in real-time trying to mobilize marines and C-130s and the fighter aircraft, and they were told explicitly by the White House stand down and do nothing.   This is not a terrorist action."

"If that is true, and I've been told this by a fairly reliable U.S. senator, if that is true and comes out, I think it raises enormous questions...given that the president said he had instructions they are supposed to do everything they could to secure American personnel."

Thursday, October 18, 2012
Up on Frequency

In recent posts, we've asked the fundamental question about the terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi, which resulted in the deaths of four Americans: what did the administration know, and when did they know it?

As we've noted, there was a steady stream of intelligence reporting on the attack, delivered at the FLASH/CRITIC level.   Messages assigned that priority must be delivered to the President within 10 minutes of receipt.   This traffic captured conversations between the Islamist factions responsible for the attack, before and during the assault on our compound.   That's why administration claims that incident was some sort of "demonstration gone bad" are nothing more than a lie.

Ditto for Joe Biden's claim that Benghazi was some sort of intelligence failure.   By all accounts, the spooks did their job, and it was apparent within minutes that our consulate was under attack by terrorists, not ordinary Libyans incensed over that internet video.   If Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has any shred of integrity remaining, he should resign immediately in protest over how his community is being "used" to conceal leadership failures of the first magnitude.

But terrorist phone traffic wasn't the only source of information on the night of September 11, 2012.   According to Fox News military analyst Colonel David Hunt (who spent most of his Army career in special forces), various U.S. command centers - in the U.S. and overseas - received a running account of the attack - while it unfolded - from a State Department official inside the consulate.   Hunt detailed who was listening in during a recent interview with Boston radio host Howie Carr.   Here's a partial transcript of their recent conversation, re-posted at

HUNT: What happened is that a woman named Lamb, Undersecretary of State for DSS (Department of State Security), 2 days ago, told Issa's committee that she listened, was talking to, and recorded an almost six hour fight that resulted in the death of four Americans.   She was at the State Department's Operations Center in Foggy Bottom in DC.

When that happens, there are a bunch of people that get informed.   President of the US gets found - the embassy is being attacked - Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Director of CIA, and on and on.

What also happens is that their command centers, National Command Center (CIA), White House Situation Room - twelve [Command Centers] that I won't bore you with.   At least twelve separate Command Centers are listening to the same conversation.   It went on for six hours.   The question I think, besides the fact that Biden is lying about it, is why didn't we do anything?   Why didn't the United States government react?

Here we are, listening to an attack, and we didn't do a thing.   We've got aircraft in Europe, aircraft in the in the Gulf, and we have the capability of doing something, and we did nothing.   But for the Vice President...   My point is everybody, from the moment the attack happened, in our government, and the decision-making capability, knew that it was an attack, that it was organized, that it was violent, and that it had nothing, nothing to do with a riot, an assembly of people, or a film.

This was not even close to an intelligence failure.   This was prescient, actionable information.   And this woman testified to it, and everyone's giving everyone a pass.

We sat by and watched the Embassy fall, and four Americans died.

Carr: Who was on the radio in the consulate in Benghazi?

HUNT: Department of State Security employee - a DSS agent was at the operation center in Benghazi.   They had a room with radios and cameras.   And he makes the call; he punches the alert button.   Does everything correct and calls his boss in DC.

Then he describes the attack for the whole time, until that the command center is overcome.   But when she [Lamb] gets the phone call….

Carr: He's killed. He's killed.   He's at the radio when he gets killed. Is that right?

HUNT: The radio stays open.   It's still being recorded until it gets destroyed.

Lamb, who is in DC listening to all of this - Clinton gets called, the President gets called, the Joint Chiefs - everybody gets called about this.   This is an embassy under attack.   Period.   It's an automatic phone call.

And the fact that we have this recording, instantly.   We know exactly the picture. By the way, he sent pictures back because he had cameras.

So, the administration knew; they watched it, let it happen, and then for eight days lied about it.   And then yesterday, last night, unfortunately, the Vice President of the US just lied.   He knows it was not an intelligence failure. No one ever said that, by the way. This is a case where we have information and didn't act.   It wasn't a case where we weren’t provided [info].   We had instant knowledge, accurate description, and just sat by and did nothing.

Carr: You said there were a dozen posts listening to this play by play account.

HUNT: Sure.

Carr: Just give me a few examples of what kind of agencies would have been involved in this listening or monitoring.

HUNT: National Military Command Center in the Pentagon (that's the military head), the White House Situation Room, the CIA Operations Center, the Counterterrorism Center, EUCON (European Command).   Africa Command, Special Operations Command, SOC-EUR [?] Special Operations Command Europe), Atlantic Command, NATO.   Everybody.

Once this call is made, and a button is pushed, saying, oh by the way, we have an attack going on, everybody listens in - this is old tech, an old procedure that’s been going on for years.   Anybody who has ever been on a watch listening in the military knows what I am talking about.   And it is amazing to me that this is not even being discussed. It is the elephant in the living room for me.   We knew this was going on and did nothing.

Carr: Let's say, let's say there's the African Command and some sergeant is monitoring it, and you know, he's there and he listens to what's going on, and he says, captain come over and listen to this.   And the captain listens to it, and I guess the captain would have to call his superior officer, right?   And then at some point , wouldn't all these people be calling the Pentagon or the State Department in Foggy Bottom and say, Hey there's a problem in Benghazi.   What are we gonna do?

HUNT: Within minutes that happens.   It's instantaneous notification of an entire chain of command.   An embassy is under attack and falling.   And oh, by the way, turn to channel 27, and here's the information.   And then these separate places are asking for – some cases begging for - guidance.   What do you want us to do? Because the military guys, whether it's in Bahrain or Europe, or any place else, can't on their own just go in there, but we have the means available.   The point is that nobody pushed the button to say "GO."   Nobody had the guts.   Nobody cared enough.   Six hours"

Meanwhile, the National Security Agency (NSA) was adding even more detail to the picture, through its communications intercepts and reporting.   So, as the attack unfolded, administration officials not only knew what was going on inside the consulate, they had a good idea of who was behind the incident, and were quite aware the sophisticated attack (using RPGs and other heavy weapons) was not the work of an angry mob.

Yet, the administration continued to lie, as evidenced by Joe Biden's whoppers last week, and the "video" story that made the rounds last month.   Such conduct is inexcusable, and beyond the pale by any stretch of political imagination.   Yet the same media that worried about George Bush's "lies" in Iraq have exhibited far less concern about the fabrications that followed the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, including the administration's refusal to describe the incident as a terrorist attack for nearly two weeks.

The White House has made a concerted effort to blame the attack on a video - apparently to uphold the myth that there have been no terrorist attacks since Obama became president.   Obama boasted, "The minute I found out what was happening" in Benghazi, I ordered that everything possible be done to protect our personnel.   That is either a lie or he is being disobeyed.

Go figure.
Posted by Spook86

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) October 24, 2012.

The first and most pressing question for Mr. Obama remains: Where the hell were the Marines?   Two of the most potentially vulnerable or dangerous American embassies are in Iraq and Libya.   In Iraq, we have roughly 17,000 people guarding our ambassador.   Not all of them are Marines, but some several hundred are, and they guard our ambassador behind a 10-foot-high walled fortress.   In Iraq, we cannot afford to take any unnecessary risks with our diplomats and go to great lengths to ensure that there are plenty of armed personnel between our representatives and any potential threats.

In Libya, there were no uniformed Marines guarding our ambassador.   Originally, there was a 16-person security team led by Col.   Andrew Wood, who had requested to stay in Libya.   In July, Stevens sent memos to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee requesting an "extension of tour of duty (TDY) personnel."   Stevens was referring to Col. Wood's 16-man team, which was scheduled to leave in August.   Stevens requested on Aug. 2 - just six weeks before his murder - to keep security personnel in Libya "through mid-September," calling the conditions there "unpredictable, volatile and violent."   Col. Woods has also said that he repeatedly requested to remain in Libya because he felt both the environment and the ambassador were unsafe.

Now, after the tragic fact, no one knows what happened to Stevens' original request.   Why was the security team that both Stevens and Col. Woods requested sent home?   Who made this decision?   ...The president now says, "The buck stops here."   It's time for him to prove it, and if he won't, it is time for Congress to do its job and get to the bottom of it.

President Obama and Hillary Clinton were insincere, says the father of former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods.   Woods and fellow former SEAL Glen Doherty responded to the terror attack at the Libya consulate a mile away from where they were stationed.   They were tragically killed in action defending the lives of our diplomats including murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens.

"When [Obama] came over to our little area" at Andrews Air Force Base, says Woods, "he kind of just mumbled, you know, 'I'm sorry.'   His face was looking at me, but his eyes were looking over my shoulder like he could not look me in the eye.   And it was not a sincere, 'I'm really sorry, you know, that your son died,' but it was totally insincere, more of whining type, 'I'm sorry.'"

Woods says that shaking President Obama's hands at his son's memorial service was "like shaking hands with a dead fish."   "It just didn't feel right,".

Woods says he was told by military officials that the military could have "come above [the area] and completely carpeted area," and therefore saved the officials in Benghazi, Libya.   But that someone gave the command for the American military not to save the lives of the Americans under attack.

"When I heard, you know, that there's a very good chance that the White House as well as other members of the military knew what was going on and obviously someone had to say, don't go rescue them.   Because every person in the military - their first response [would be], we're going to go rescue them.   We need to find out who it was that gave that command - do not rescue them."

"BENGHAZI-GATE" keeps blowing up worse and worse for President Obama and his administration.   A CIA spokesman placed the blame squarely on the White House when they released a statement saying "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate."   So the decision not to come to the aid of Ambassador Stevens and those defending him had to have come from the White House.

Lt. Col. Tony Schafer told Fox News that sources were telling him that the President was watching the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya in real-time.

Schafer told Fox that "only the President" could have ordered backup for the Americans who were under siege by terrorists so the President was most certainly informed of the situation as it was unfolding.

"I hate to say this," Schafer said, "according to my sources, yes, [the President] was one of those in the White House situation room in real-time watching this.

And the question becomes, 'What did the President do or not do in the moments he saw this unveiling?'   He - only he - could issue a directive to Secretary of Defense Panetta to do something."

Charles Woods, says that the life of his son Ty could have been saved, but their repeated requests for backup were denied.   Ty Woods and fellow former SEAL Glen Doherty responded to the terror attack at the Libya consulate a mile away from where they were stationed.   They were tragically killed in action defending the lives of our diplomats including murdered Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Woods says he was told by military officials that the military could have "come above [the area] and completely carpeted area," and therefore saved the officials in Benghazi, Libya.   But that someone gave the command for the American military not to save the lives of the Americans under attack.

"When I heard, you know, that there's a very good chance that the White House as well as other members of the military knew what was going on and obviously someone had to say, don't go rescue them.   Because every person in the military--their first response [would be], we're going to go rescue them. We need to find out who it was that gave that command - do not rescue them."

The Motives

Sources are saying that President Obama was watching the situation unfold.   So why did he do nothing?

It's clear that this is a scandal that has the potential to sink Obama and his re-election chances.   The media knows this, and they were trying to bury this story as we came down to the final days of Obama's campaign to stay in office another 4 years.   It was stated that we can't afford another 4 years of Obama's weak leadership.   This was a partly incorrect statement.   Obama is not a weak leader, nor is he stupid - although he certainly lacks wisdom and humanity.   A narcissistic psychopath with a cunning mind is subhuman because he lacks the capacity to empathize with others.   This is especially true if he was raised as a Muslim and tutored by communists.   Obama wishes to destroy the U.S. military so that a world government military can take over.   He is far worse than Adolph Hitler was, and he has studied Hitler's methods.   See The Communist Triumvirate, Psychopathic Personalities, Fascist Communist Tactics, and Barack Hussein Obama.

First the administration refused to acknowledge that the attack in Benghazi was a terrorist attack, still pointing to the childish Utube video they blamed for two weeks.   Now we learn this, from the father of one of the Americans who lost their lives.   Benghazi-gate has been called "bigger than Watergate" by some political analysts.   But why wasn't Obama not being made to answer these tough questions?   He just kept campaigning.   For one thing, Obama was in an election and the media was taken over long ago by Communist letter-writing brigades and owners who were in accord with the Council on Foreign Relations and those who are part of the Shadow Party and constitute the Federal Reserve members.

For two weeks the administration refused to acknowledge what everyone else could plainly see, because admitting that the terrorists were still out there, still plotting against America, was also admitting that all of Obama's rhetoric about repairing our relationships in the Middle East is a big fat failure.

Obama muzzled the military according to Congressman Buck McKeon, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.   They were not allowed to answer direct questions about the Benghazi murders when speaking with McKeon's committee.

This is one of many reasons why only five high ranking (generals and admirals) military men are supporting Obama while 500 are anti-Obama (they believe Romney would be far better as a Commander-in-Chief).


It is true that a narcissistic psychopath would care so little about killing four more Americans that he would do everything possible during an election to stop people from knowing of it.   He has spent plenty of money to keep his past from being discovered.   He has killed hundreds through "Fast and Furious", using Eric Holder as his "right hand".   He has killed more hundreds of U.S. military men by withholding the needed troops in Afghanistan.   Indeed the list goes on and on.

Yet there may be much more at stake here than simply wanting to win an election.   Did Obama have some reason to deliberately kill either Stevens or one of the CIA operatives in Benghazi?   It is standard doctrine for a communist dictator to kill those who can implicate one who might be able to put a finger on a skeleton in his closet.   It is also standard doctrine to kill someone who might be doing something that is a danger to a dictator's plans.

Chances are Obama doesn't worry about being discovered as long as he can control enough to make the discovery irrelevant.   Several of his cabinet members have resigned now.   They gave different reasons for their resignations, but I believe that they all have either a distaste for having to deal with a boss who is scum - or they are fearful that he might "throw them under the bus" like he did Stevens.   A number of people are claiming that Obama was not at fault now that he is the dictator again.   Dictators use fall guys to be sure that they keep their subjects ignorant of facts that might tend to depose them.

December 16, 2012
Including the Newtown Massacre

Hillary Clinton has been avoiding testifying about the Benghazi murders.   First she had to go somewhere, and now she has supposedly fainted and hit her head to cause a concussion, so she is being "monitored by doctors in her home".

A diversion was badly needed to take minds off of the "Fast and Furious" fiasco by Eric Holder, the BATF, and most probably Obama.   Since Obama signed a treaty which, if ratified by two-thirds of the Senators present, would take away American rights under the Second Amendment, a good anti-gun diversion would be best.   Such a diversion (or even more diversions) would also be useful in taking minds off Obama's Benghazi murders.   An extremely emotional issue would be the best kind, and we can be assured that Obama, Holder, Clinton, and many BATF administrators were praying for such a diversion - did they find a way to cause one?

The school shooting on Friday (Dec 14, 2012) in Newtown, Connecticut, has created what is probably the most emotional type of diversion possible for Obama, and an opportunity for him go somewhere and show what a compassionate family man he is - likewise for Eric Holder who is responsible for the mass killings caused by his "fast and furious" fiasco.   This causes one to wonder whether the shooting was part of a deliberate attempt by the left to use maximum use of emotion to sway Congress and the American people to give up their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Obama shed crocodile tears and did a creditable job of acting as if he were grief-stricken.   This is one of the talents of community organizers, whether exploiting a disaster caused by the left or by simply taking advantage of a crisis (never let a good crisis go to waste).   The media seems to have been taken in, and Obama is going to show himself at the crime scene to do more acting as he gloats on the change of venu from the Benghazi murders.

Comrade Senator Feinstein very predictably is pushing more legislation against what she calls assault type firearms - meaning essentially any weapon that is semi-automatic.   The left wants all firearms to be taken from American citizens so that a socialist/ communist government can take over completely.   Soros and the Shadow Party want the same, since communist governments are more easily controlled.

Lieberman wants a commission set up to look into all the nation's laws on firearms, violent video games, and violent movies.   This will probably result in another bid to take away states' rights under the Constitution when it should be a means to guarantee individual rights under the Second Amendment.   In every instance of mass killings by an individual, the targets were in areas where no gun was legal - consequently, innocent and unprotected victims were killed.   Had firearms been allowed, the killer would either have opted to give up his scheme or would have been stopped dead in his tracks before he could go very far.   However, we should give the benefit of a doubt and hope that a little bit of common sense is exhibited as such a commission deals with an extremely emotional issue.

Apparently, certain justices of the Supreme Court are now considering laws that allow citizens to have firearms in public - another gun grab by leftists at a time when emotions are at a fever pitch and mental ability is temporarily crippled.

There is talk of doing a better job of locking up schools.   But does that mean the children cannot have recess?   And is there any door that cannot be opened or removed by some means?   In the days when there were castles, moats, fortresses, and the like to shelter their people, there were always means for a thinking enemy to force his way in.   The best defense is to have force inside or on the grounds that can stop a killer in his tracks.   Teachers and school administrators should be somewhat proficient in the use of firearms and should have such arms instantly available.

I grew up in an area where everyone was taught firearm safety and marksmanship by National Rifle Association instructors.   We were allowed to carry loaded guns of all types either exposed or concealed.   No individual was stupid enough to even think seriously of getting by with a school massacre.

A Fox News contributor, regarding the means of discovering potential mass murderers, stated that one means was to look for the symptoms of a dangerous mental problem.   He said that the symptoms were failure to obey rules and extreme narcissism.   Do we know anyone like that? Obama does not obey the Constitution and whenever a TV camera is nearby he tries to capitalize upon it.   When he speaks it is usually about "I", meaning himself.

Was he responsible for the massacre in Newtown?   Maybe not directly, but the left does all it can to make more and more redundant rules and laws as well as new rules and laws - until no one can function without breaking one once in while, and usually cannot even know that he is doing so.   The frustration caused by bad rules and laws eventually causes those of us on the ragged edge of sanity to break.   And, as we saw with Benghazi and the Fast and Furious operation, he and his minions may sometimes be directly responsible for murders.   Perhaps we should pay particular attention to the investigations for the school shooting and look closely for any bias in the reports.

A Letter to the Editor published February 7, 2012
This encapsulates what happened.

Editor -

Four Americans were murdered by terrorists on Sept 11, 2012, largely because they were not given adequate security or help - even though more than seven hours elapsed in which time help could have arrived from fighter jets, AC-130s, or attack helicopters.   However, this was just before the election and Obama could not admit that he had not heroically slowed down the terrorists.   Consequently, no help was sent and the victims gave their lives to assure Obama's victory.

On Jan. 23, 2013, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and then later with the House Foreign Relations Committee.   She was supposed to be a witness as to what actually happened to allow four Americans to be murdered in Benghazi.   It turned out to be a cohesively obsequious display by Democrats, using up time by praising Clinton, grandstanding, and diverting attention from the supposed purpose of the meeting, doing the verbal equivalent of lining up and kissing Clinton's bottom.   Most of the Republicans were naive, disorganized, and ill-focused.

After four months of dodging the meeting, Clinton had obviously found the "right" answers to the questions posed.   The tough ones she promised to answer in writing later.   There was a five minute rule for each person's questions (hardly enough time to deal with even one of the many questions), and a time limit for the meeting, so that Clinton could easily use up the time with her own grandstanding and diversions.   It was obvious that any future investigation by the House or Senate would be a waste of taxpayer money and a national disgrace.   A court of law would be a far better alternative.

Clinton actually answered a few questions, disclosing that the State Department scapegoats had been given month-long paid vacations, that she was ignorant of any incriminating emails, that she took full responsibilty (even though her actions did not indicate this), and that she and the president had called the incident a "terrorist attack" the morning after it happened (an outright lie).

It is a shame that the people we vote into office frequently turn out to have egocentric, eight-year-old mentalities.   It is no wonder that people in other nations often consider us to be unworthy of their trust.

On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, another hearing was held on Benghazi in which it became abundantly clear that Hillary Clinton had repeatedly lied during the first hearing and has been lying all along.   The usual obstructionist democrats did their best to obfiscate the issue, but to no avail.   The trail has led to the one closest to Clinton in the State Department, indicating that Clinton was party to the cover-up or possibly the major player in it.   It was also quite clear that the three whistleblowers who were sworn in had been intimidated by the State Department in an effort to prevent them from testifying.   There is talk now of forming a committee of representatives in the House which will subpoena other witnesses, including Clinton.   Also other whistleblowers will most likely be testifying.

One other item of interest was an interview with a Boston police detective who explained that the Boston police were handicapped by the FBI in doing their job regarding the bombing at the marathon.   He told us that the FBI was a political organization (which it is) headed by a political appointee who ultimately answers to Eric Holder and the president.   The flow of politically-motivated orders in the FBI comes from the top down.   So (1) those who play ball will keep their jobs and those who protest will lose their jobs, and (2) the idea of gaining information from the actual situation is overshadowed by orders regarding what can be used best for the political interests of the administration.

The fertilizer factory explosion in West, Texas, is being investigated as a possible terrorist act as are other explosions that have been happening of late.

November 24, 2013
Received a Judicial Watch Member Report with the title
On the Anniversary of the Benghzi Attack of September 11, 2012
Unanswered Questions and the Quest for Accountablity
From the Obama Administration.
Excerpts from the Introduction:
...this updated Special Report...on the...attacks on American personnel and facilities in Benghazi...with the expertise of Judicial Watch investigators, as well as an insightful security critique and analysis of Mr. Raymond Fournier, a recently retired Diplomatic Security Service Special Agent. Part One of this updated report summarizes Mr. Fourier's analysis...and Part Two is new reporting - describing the Obama administration's Benghazi stonewall...

Excerpts from the Background:
Since January, Judicial Watch has continued to pursue its investigations into the attack-related well as an expanded investigation into the Obama administration's politically-driven cover-up of events before, during, and after the terrorist attack...

Excerpts from pages 19 and 20 of the 20 plus pages of the report:

...Representative Frank Wolf (VA-10) has proposed the creation of a bipartisan House Select Committee to fully investigate the terrorist attack... The track record of the various committees of the House in getting to the whole truth...has been poor. A single Select Committee appears to be the best forum for the American people to ever learn the truth... Survivors and other knowledgeable government officials would finally be able to come forward and testify without fear of retribution and reprisal...

The proposed committee would have subpoena power and the authority to take sworn depositions. Those powerful legal tools have a way of "focusing" the attention of persons who might wish to forget Benghazi as a "phony scandal".

Rep. Wolf has introduced House Resolution 36 "Establishing a select committee to investigate and report on the attack on the United States consolate in Benghazi, Libya". The proposed legislation has been endorsed by the mother of Sean Smith; members of the Special Operations community; the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association; the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal; and other notable organizations and institutions.

There are three ways mentioned for Americans to obtain the truth:

1.   Demand accountability from your members of Congress.

2.   Be persistent. Don't let them dodge the issue even if it takes years to get the answers.

3.   Support Judicial Watch. They ask tough questions, demand answers, investigate, analyze, report, and litigate.

You may contact Judicial Watch for copies of this report.

Judicial Watch, Inc.
425 Third Street, SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024

Phone: (202) 646 - 5172
Fax: (202) 646 - 5199




Benghazi is an excellent example.
Added to website January 15, 2014

I.   Eliminate witnesses.   By not allowing help to arrive, many of the key witnesses were eliminated permanently.

II.   Provide disinformation.   This was done repeatedly with claims that there was no terrorist attack - just a demonstration against an insult to Islam.
      A.   This may take the public away from the truth.
      B.   Creates a diversion which aids cover-up for a time.

III.   Stall in every possible way.   Like Hillary Clinton with her "illness".
      A.   Allows time to formulate excuses or create more diversions.
      B.   Allows time to research, redact, and destroy incriminating documents.
      C.   Allows time to influence remaining witnesses with
            (1).   Intimidation
                    (a).   Of themselves.
                    (b).   Of those close to them.
            (2).   Bribery.
            (3).   Killing.
            (4).   Discrediting.
      D.   Allows time for populace to forget.

IV.   Lie, lie, lie, repeating the lies over and over again.   Obama does this all the time.   The gullible Americans will believe a lie that is repeated often enough.

V.   Use more and more diversions to remove unwanted attention.

It has been sixteen months since Ambassador Stevens and his people were killed.   Witnesses are being examined who were not allowed to testify or were threatened should they do so.   Some dropped out of sight (who knows what happened to them?)   Those who are testifying now should not be easily believed because there has been so much time to intimidate or bribe them.   The Republicans, who should have insisted early-on to force witnesses to come forth by use of subpoena power, have been too timid or too well bribed to use their full capability.   Because the truth is so elusive at this point, Judicial Watch may be the only avenue available to discover what really happened.   Politicians on both sides cannot be trusted. We must continue to hammer them if they do not stay the course.

It seems to be more and more evident that Stevens was sent to Benghazi to do something that he was not to disclose - like monitor shipments of arms stowed at the consulate for use by the Syrian rebels who are from the Muslim Brotherhood.   If Al Qaeda were supposed to take the arms it could explain why those known to be the perpetrators have not been captured.   Our Muslim President would not allow it, and he would kill those who might have known of the arms being stored.   And perhaps Stevens did not know that he was being set up for elimination.   It is possible that our psychopath-in-chief simply did not want to have another black mark on his record before the election, but I believe that there was more to it than that.

May 22, 2014

The following is an email supposedly written by a cousin of Ambassador Stevens, a U.S. Navy Chaplain, Senior Pastor retired. It definitely has a ring of truth about it, and deserves to be passed on to more people.

THIS IS A TRUE STORY...and a dirty one!

You need to read this true account of what happened to our Ambassador Stevens and the other 3 who died. If this doesn't make you mad.........Cynthia Lee Myers wanted to share the truth of what happened over in Libya. You will not find this in the media yet, but it aired on FNC.

"Here is my story. A week out the Embassy in Tripoli began receiving multiple tips about an Al Queda cell in the area planning an attack on 9/11 in response to the killing of Bin Laden. For the next several days, the state dept and WH were asked for a security force and were denied at least six times. Ambassador Stevens and his team were given the all clear that the Consulate in Benghazi was safe and there was no need for a security force other than his 3 personal guards(One being my cousin) and a few Libyans who were not armed. Then the attack and murders occurred.

Immediately the WH claimed it was a protest gone bad over a you tube video. Obama made a quick speech in the Rose Garden on Sept.12 before catching a plane to Vegas to campaign. He made a generic statement at the end of his speech after placing the blame on an overheated protest over the video. He said "No act of terror will shake the resolve of America. Later that day and over the next 2 days, the liberal media began saying Ambassador Stevens and the other 3 men died of smoke inhalation. This was not the case.

Out of respect for my cousin, I'm not going to be specific about his murder. However Ambassador Stevens was brutally murdered. His genitals were cut off, he was sodomized and beaten and cut and stabbed and burned. He was drug thru the streets and left for dead. This is eyewitness testimony of a local Dr. who found the Ambassador in a ditch and tried to save his life. He had no idea who he was. The other 3 men, including my cousin, met similar fates. And deaths due to smoke inhalation is a 100% fabricated LIE. The next week I drove my aunt and Uncle and 2 others to receive his body. We met with Hillary, Panetta, and Susan Rice, ALL of whom apologized and said it was a protest gone bad over a video and exited the area. Next, Obama entered with the same story and didn't apologize and wasn't sympathetic. My aunt cried to this man and all he did was hand her flowers and walk away. I tried to get his attention, but didn't. I got upset and yelled liar to him, he kept walking. Then a secret service agent grabbed my arm and led me to a room where I was held till the proceedings were over.

America, I saw firsthand how cold this man is. What kind of liar he is. Most of you haven't a clue about this tyrant and yet you support him. And act like every word he says is Gospel. These murders and the fast and furious cover ups make Watergate look like a kid who told his bff's secret to the class.


The stunning part of this story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

The news has been full of the attacks on our embassies throughout the Muslim world, and in particular, the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in Benghazi , Libya .. However, there's a little known story of incredible bravery, heroics, and courage that should be the top story.

So what actually happened at the U.S. embassy in Libya? We are learning more about this every day. Ambassador Stevens and Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, along with administrative staff, were working out of temporary quarters due to the fact that in the spring of 2011 during the so-called Arab Spring, the United States cut ties with then president Moammar Gadhafi. Our embassy was looted and ransacked, causing it to be unusable. It is still in a state of disrepair. Security for embassies and their personnel is to be provided by the host nation. Since Libya has gone through a civil war of sorts in the past 18 months, the current government is very unstable, and therefore, unreliable.

A well-organized attack by radical Muslims was planned specifically targeting the temporary U.S. embassy building. The Libyan security force that was in place to protect our people deserted their post, or joined the attacking force. Either way, our people were in a real fix.

And it should be noted that Ambassador Stevens had mentioned on more than one occasion to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, that he was quite concerned for his personal safety and the welfare of his people.

It is thought that Ambassador Stevens was on a "hit list". A short distance from the American compound, two Americans were sleeping. They were in Libya as independent contractors working an assignment totally unrelated to our embassy. They also happened to be former Navy Seals.

When they heard the noise coming from the attack on our embassy, as you would expect from highly trained warriors, they ran to the fight. Apparently, they had no weapons, but seeing the Libyan guards dropping their guns in their haste in fleeing the scene, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty snatched up several of these discarded weapons and prepared to defend the American compound.

Not knowing exactly what was taking place, the two Seals set up a defensive perimeter. Unfortunately Ambassador Stevens was already gravely injured, and Foreign Service officer, Sean Smith, was dead. However, due to their quick action and suppressive fire, twenty administrative personnel in the embassy were able to escape to safety. ( But all have been silenced and kept away from congress and all investigations on Benghazi!! ) Eventually, these two courageous men were overwhelmed by the sheer numbers brought against them, an enemy force numbering between 100 to 200 attackers which came in two waves. But the stunning part of the story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

As it became apparent to these selfless heroes, they were definitely going to lose their lives unless some reinforcements showed up in a hurry. As we know now, that was not to be. I'm fairly certain they knew they were going to die in this gun fight, but not before they took a whole lot of bad guys with them!

Consider these tenets of the Navy SEAL Code:

1) Loyalty to Country, Team and Teammate,

2) Serve with Honor and Integrity On and Off the Battlefield,

3) Ready to Lead, Ready to Follow, Never Quit,

4) Take responsibility for your actions and the actions of your teammates,

5) Excel as Warriors through Discipline and Innovation,

6) Train for War, Fight to Win, Defeat our Nation's Enemies, and...

7) Earn your Trident every day.

Thank you, Tyrone and Glen. To the very last breath, you both lived up to the SEAL Code. You served all of us well. You were courageous in the face of certain death. And Tyrone, even though you never got to hold your newborn son, he will grow up knowing the character and quality of his father, a man among men who sacrificed himself defending others.

Signed by:
Dr. Charles R. Roots Senior Pastor Former Staff Sergeant, USMC Captain, U. S. Navy Chaplain Corps (Ret.)

And Let us never forget Hillary Clinton's Comment "What Difference Does It Make?"

And she wants to be our next president! She should be sitting in prison right now.

May 26, 2014

Some time ago, B.O. (Obama) signed the START III Treaty with Vladimir Putin cutting our nuclear arsenal in half (to 1500 warheads). Our arsenal was one of our chief advantages over Russia. Putin made out very well and we lost - which is one reason Putin has been so brazen in his taking over Crimea. Of course, B.O. works for Putin in the larger scheme of things since Communism is still centered in Russia from which Cuba and the South American socialist nations take their orders.

B.O. stated to Dmitri Medvedev, when he did not know the microphone was still on, "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it's important for him [Vladimir Putin] to give me space... This is my last election. After my election I can have more flexibility."

B.O. ordered the Defense Department to explore the possibility of reducing our number of warheads to 300, which is essentially disarming us. Now, the B.O. State Department has given the Russians permission to place GPS tracking stations across the United States.

These tracking stations give the Russians a foothold on American territory that will increase the accuracy of Russian satellite-guided weapons. These stations also provide Russia with a new espionage tool for spying upon our military and civilian commercial secrets.

The Russians have been stealing our secrets for generations and they are still behind us technologically. These tracking stations will give them what they need to catch up with us. But this is all part of the plan to weaken us so that the United Nations can tell us what to do. The U.N. is dominated by socialist/communist nations who want to take us down to their level. B.O. is just a tool in the toolbox of our enemies.

When Russia told us the Cold War was over, they were merely lying to put us to sleep while they took us over "peacefully". Russia needed time to relax militarily until a few generations of weapons improvement had passed. Now, Putin is beginning to catch up militarily even though he already has taken over the U.S. with agents like B.O., Biden, Pelosi, Reid, and hundreds of civil servants.

The communist-dominated democrats are already responsible for reducing our nation's defenses. They also are responsible for the problems with military pay (below poverty level in many cases), military health care, and other "perks" which make military life a little less intolerable. The object is to reduce the number of men and women who volunteer to serve our country. During the last ten years, the size of our armed forces has been reduced by about one-third.

The U.S. Navy is operating with the smallest number of ships since 1936. We operate with Navy and Marine Corps tactical aircraft that are over 15 years old, and with Air Force aircraft that are over 20 years old.

Pork barrel spending is taking dollars away from our defense budget when the primary goal of the federal government is supposed to be national defense. Until we have enough representatives and senators who are patriotic rather than party-oriented, people in the executive branch of government who are pro-U.S. rather than treasonous, we will continue to sink to the level of the third world nations.